This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Maximizing Impact, Minimizing Costs: A Strategic Approach to Coaching in Resource-Constrained Government Institutions Government institutions serve as the backbone of a nation, charged with upholding public trust, managing essential services, and advancing societal welfare (Sedgwick, 2016). Heslin et al., 2009 ; Ellinger et al.,
Coaching involves “unlocking people’s potential to maximize their own performance” (Sir John Whitmore). It promotes a growth mindset, enabling continuouslearning and adaptation to evolving needs. Psychologist and journalist Daniel Goleman proposes coaching as a key leadership style, boosting performance culture and profits.
Additionally, there was considerable focus on the goal-setting process and conducting performance discussions. This shift is crucial, as it addresses the issue of employee disengagement and lack of commitment to perform at their best. References Coaching for Performance: The Principles an. Otto Scharmer, 2016.
This is the secret sauce of any high-performing organization but can be hard to recognize if you were not there at the beginning. He was criticized in 2016 for incorrectly predicting the results of the election, but he had only given Hillary Clinton a 64.5% Nothing has served me better in my long life than continuouslearning.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content